Saturday 3 November 2012

A Tale of Two Manohars


There have been explosive disclosures made by Mr. Arvind Kejriwal in last few weeks. Some of the allegations, if correct, makes one wonder if comments made by Mr. Robert Vadra describing India as Banana republic were indeed not utterly absurd.  

One such allegation drew my attention last week. This relates to an allegation about a driver, Manohar of a powerful politician, Mr. Nitin Gadkari, being the director of many allegedly “bogus” companies. It did not surprise me. It has been common for powerful officials and politicians to have “benami” properties in the name of their relatives, friends and other confidants. This seems to be an outdated short cut now to make illegal wealth without getting noticed by law agencies. With the growth of Indian economy, at least two things have changed in this “unscrupulous” model. Law agencies now include tracking of the relatives and friends of suspects. As a result, drivers and other “less educated” and unsuspecting characters have been given this responsibility now. The other change signifies growth of corporate culture in the country. The “benamis” are not only “Real estate”, “Cash” or ”Jewellery”, but also ownership of “benami” companies. These private companies then may act as cover for illegal money transfers.

There are other added advantages of having less educated and poor assistants or servants to own ones’ “benami” properties. Due to change (or decline) in social and family values in our country, it is no longer safe to trust your close relatives. These relatives are well aware of the nature of the property and once they become hostile, there is not much one can do to snatch it back. Political compulsions may also not allow to use force in such cases. On the other hand, poor servants and assistants like drivers normally are not very well educated. They may not even know/understand if they own something valuable as only their names are being used in most cases. These poor people will also remain loyal for their proximity to powerful masters and it gives them job security as well. They are content with the regular salary, facilities and occasional gratitude showered by their masters from time to time. The social status of being close to a powerful man comes as a bonus. They are normally not visible to law enforcing agencies and can be easily disposed of, if situation so demands. In case they dare to turn hostile, there are ways to deal with them using muscle power without being suspected. Overall apparently win-win situation for both powerful masters and poor servants.

But…..this cannot be a true picture of a growing economy. The whole world is watching the tremendous progress India has made in terms of economic growth. How one can explain such a “retro” and “derogatory” view about Indian society and polity? Indeed, there are glorious stories of Indian lower and middle class outperforming and giving thrust to Indian economy. I cannot resist but mention the story of another driver Manohar (name changed), who retired as a millionaire from Infosys. The then Infosys Chairman gifted few shares and offered ESOPs (Employee Stock Options) to his driver, Manohar along with other drivers, office assistants and secretaries  in early nineties.  With tremendous IT growth, low and middle class employees went on to become millionaires. The idea of sharing wealth with all sections of Indian society was thus achieved in true sense by progressive and democratic corporate culture. Indian corporates showed a way to others the true potential of Indians. It is rather shameful that some sections have chosen to ignore it. The “Infosys” Manohar will be able to provide better education and values to his children. He will be able to choose his career independently. He will earn higher social status. He will live with self-respect and dignity. The “Benami” Manohar may continue to live in poverty and will be dependent on his masters to provide education to his children. His children will take inspiration from him and will probably continue to carry the burden of their parents’ loyalty to powerful masters. Realising that their identity is solely dependent on their association with powerful masters, there will be little option to look for other career opportunities independently. Even if they try, no one would probably dare to employ them fearing the wrath of powers that be.

The tale of two Manohars can not be completed fairly without mention of some progressive steps taken by Indian politicians. It is the power of RTI (Right to Information) act which enabled these disclosures. Not sure how history will remember Dr. Manmohan Singh, but he will be surely remembered for the RTI act, which was introduced and passed under his leadership- He only needs to resist the pressure from some quarters to dilute this act.

Having said that, it is not going to take very long that these unscrupulous elements will realise the futility of making money illegally in vibrant, progressive and awakened India, where there are ample opportunities to make money honestly.

 - Sandeep

 

No comments:

Post a Comment